Referências

ARIOLI, M.; DUFF, I.; RUIZ, D. Stopping criteria for iterative solvers. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, [s. l.], vol. 13, no. 1, p. 138–144, 1992.

AXTELL, R. L.; FARMER, J. D. Agent-based modeling in economics and finance: Past, present, and future. Journal of Economic Literature, [s. l.], 2022.

BRIMACOMBE, M. P-values and laws of large numbers: Practical interpretation of significance in very large samples. Population Medicine, [s. l.], vol. 7, no. April, p. 1–10, 2025.

BROWN, G. W. Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. Act. Anal. Prod Allocation. [S. l.: s. n.], 1951.

CAMERER, C.; HO, T.-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in coordination games: Probability rules, heterogeneity, and time-variation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, [s. l.], vol. 42, no. 2, p. 305–326, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1998.1217.

CAMERER, C.; HUA HO, T. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica, [s. l.], vol. 67, no. 4, p. 827–874, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00054.

CAMERER, C.; LOVALLO, D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American economic review, [s. l.], vol. 89, no. 1, p. 306–318, 1999.

CESCHI, A.; RUBALTELLI, E.; SARTORI, R. Designing a homo psychologicus more psychologicus: Empirical results on value perception in support to a new theoretical organizational-economic agent based model. 2014. Distributed computing and artificial intelligence, 11th international conference [...]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. p. 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07593-8_9.

CHAKRABORTI, A.; TOKE, I. M.; PATRIARCA, M.; ABERGEL, F. Econophysics review: II. Agent-based models. Quantitative Finance, [s. l.], vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1013–1041, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2010.539249.

CHEN, S.-H.; DU, Y.-R. Heterogeneity in generalized reinforcement learning and its relation to cognitive ability. Cognitive Systems Research, [s. l.], vol. 42, p. 1–22, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.11.001.

CYERT, R.; MARCH, J. Behavioral theory of the firm. Organizational behavior 2. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2015. p. 60–77.

DEBASIS DAS, S. B.; SARKAR, B. Material selection in product design under risk and uncertainty introducing the conditional logit in the madm framework. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, [s. l.], vol. 36, no. 7, p. 440–450, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2019.1683089.

DIZIOLI, A.; WANG, H. How do adaptive learning expectations rationalize stronger monetary policy response in brazil? Latin American Journal of Central Banking, [s. l.], vol. 5, no. 1, p. 100119, 2024.

DONG, J. Q.; KARHADE, P. P.; RAI, A.; XU, S. X. How firms make information technology investment decisions: Toward a behavioral agency theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, [s. l.], vol. 38, no. 1, p. 29–58, 2021.

DUFFY, J.; HOPKINS, E. Learning, information, and sorting in market entry games: Theory and evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, [s. l.], vol. 51, no. 1, p. 31–62, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.04.007.

EREV, I.; ERT, E.; ROTH, A. E. A choice prediction competition for market entry games: An introduction. Games, [s. l.], vol. 1, no. 2, p. 117–136, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/g1020117.

EREV, I.; RAPOPORT, A. Coordination,“magic,” and reinforcement learning in a market entry game. Games and economic behavior, [s. l.], vol. 23, no. 2, p. 146–175, 1998.

ESMAEILI, M.; ARYANEZHAD, M.-B.; ZEEPHONGSEKUL, P. A game theory approach in seller–buyer supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], vol. 195, no. 2, p. 442–448, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.026.

FALLUCCHI, F.; NIEDERREITER, J.; RICCABONI, M. Learning and dropout in contests: An experimental approach: F. Fallucchi et al. Theory and Decision, [s. l.], vol. 90, no. 2, p. 245–278, 2021.

FARMER, J. D.; FOLEY, D. The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature, [s. l.], vol. 460, no. 7256, p. 685–686, 2009.

FÁVERO, L. P.; BELFIORE, P. Manual de análise de dados: Estatı́stica e modelagem multivariada com excel, SPSS e stata. [S. l.]: Elsevier Brasil, 2017.

FIANI, R. Teoria dos jogos. p. 388. [S. l.]: Elsevier Editora, 2006.

FISCHER, T.; RIEDLER, J. Prices, debt and market structure in an agent-based model of the financial market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, [s. l.], vol. 48, p. 95–120, 2014.

GONG, Y.; XU, X.; ZHAO, C.; SCHOENHERR, T. Multi-tier supply chain learning networks: A simulation study based on the experience-weighted attraction (EWA) model. Sustainability, [s. l.], vol. 16, no. 10, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104085.

GUO, W.; HAGHTALAB, N.; KANDASAMY, K.; VITERCIK, E. Leveraging reviews: Learning to price with buyer and seller uncertainty. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, [s. l.], vol. 22, no. 1, p. 74–82, 2024.

HONG, J.; MOINAS, S.; POUGET, S. Learning in speculative bubbles: Theory and experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, [s. l.], vol. 185, p. 1–26, 2021.

ISAAC, A. G. Simulating evolutionary games: A python-based introduction. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, [s. l.], vol. 11, no. 3, p. 8, 2008.

JOSEPHSON, J. A numerical analysis of the evolutionary stability of learning rules. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, [s. l.], vol. 32, no. 5, p. 1569–1599, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2007.06.008.

KAGEL, J. H.; ROTH, A. E. The handbook of experimental economics, volume 2. [S. l.]: Princeton University Press, 2020.

KASBEKAR, G. S.; SARKAR, S. Pricing games under uncertain competition. Technical report, [s. l.], 2010.

KIMBROUGH, S. O.; MURPHY, F. H. Strategic bidding of offer curves: An agent-based approach to exploring supply curve equilibria. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], vol. 229, no. 1, p. 165–178, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.006.

KIRMAN, A.; LAISNEY, F.; PEZANIS-CHRISTOU, P. Relaxing the symmetry assumption in participation games: A specification test for cluster-heterogeneity. Experimental Economics, [s. l.], vol. 26, no. 4, p. 850–878, 2023.

KORHONEN, P. J.; WALLENIUS, J.; GENC, T.; XU, P. On rational behavior in multi-attribute riskless choice. European Journal of Operational Research, [s. l.], vol. 288, no. 1, p. 331–342, 2021.

KÖSTER, C.; SCHENK-MATHES, H.; SPECHT, C. Explanatory power of behavioral models in the newsvendor problem: A simulation study. Central European Journal of Operations Research, [s. l.], vol. 27, no. 2, p. 311–324, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0589-9.

LEONARDOS, S.; PILIOURAS, G.; SPENDLOVE, K. Exploration-exploitation in multi-agent competition: Convergence with bounded rationality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, [s. l.], vol. 34, p. 26318–26331, 2021.

LEYE, S.; EWALD, R.; UHRMACHER, A. M. Composing problem solvers for simulation experimentation: A case study on steady state estimation. PloS one, [s. l.], vol. 9, no. 4, p. e91948, 2014.

LIU, P.; YANG, Z.; WANG, Z.; SUN, W. W. Contextual dynamic pricing with strategic buyers. Journal of the American Statistical Association, [s. l.], vol. 120, no. 550, p. 896–908, 2025.

NAGEL, R. Chapter 45 experimental beauty contest games: Levels of reasoning and convergence to equilibrium. In: PLOTT, C. R.; SMITH, V. L. (eds.). Handbook of experimental economics results. [S. l.]: Elsevier, 2008. vol. 1, p. 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00045-5.

PANGALLO, M.; SANDERS, J.; GALLA, T.; FARMER, D. Towards a taxonomy of learning dynamics in 2 x 2 games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.09043. [S. l.: s. n.], 2017.

PAYETTE, N.; SZEKELY, A.; ANDRIGHETTO, G. Social norms and cooperation in a collective-risk social dilemma: Comparing reinforcing learning and norm-based approaches. 2020. 2020 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) [...]. [S. l.: s. n.], 2020. p. 1403–1406. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223561.

PETRACCA, E. On the origins and consequences of simon’s modular approach to bounded rationality in economics. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, [s. l.], vol. 28, no. 5, p. 708–732, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2021.1877760.

RECKTENWALD, G. Stopping criteria for iterative solution methods. Portland State University, Portland, USA, [s. l.], p. 35, 2012.

ROSENBERG, N. Exploring the black box: Technology, economics, and history. [S. l.]: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

ROTH, A. E.; EREV, I. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior, [s. l.], vol. 8, no. 1, p. 164–212, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80020-X.

ROTH; EREV, A. Introduction to experimental economics. The handbook of experimental economics, [s. l.], vol. 1, p. 3–109, 1995.

SCHJAER-JACOBSEN, H. Modeling of economic uncertainty. Fuzzy Economic Review, [s. l.], vol. 9, no. 2, p. 49–73, 2004.

SHAFRAN, A. P. Learning in games with risky payoffs. Games and Economic Behavior, [s. l.], vol. 75, no. 1, p. 354–371, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2011.09.001.

SIMON, H. A. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, [s. l.], vol. 2, no. 1, p. 125–134, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.125.

SONSINO, D.; SIROTA, J. Strategic pattern recognition—experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, [s. l.], vol. 44, no. 2, p. 390–411, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00040-X.

SPILIOPOULOS, L. Beyond fictitious play beliefs: Incorporating pattern recognition and similarity matching. Games and Economic Behavior, [s. l.], vol. 81, p. 69–85, 2013.

SUN, Y.; QIAN, J. EWA selection strategy with channel handoff scheme in cognitive radio. Wireless Personal Communications, [s. l.], vol. 87, no. 1, p. 17–28, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3023-9.

WELLMAN, M. P. Economic reasoning from simulation-based game models. Œconomia. History, Methodology, Philosophy, [s. l.], no. 10-2, p. 257–278, 2020.

WOODFORD, M. Modeling imprecision in perception, valuation, and choice. Annual Review of Economics, [s. l.], vol. 12, no. 1, p. 579–601, 2020.

WU, B.; HUANG, W.; LIU, P. Carbon reduction strategies based on an NW small-world network with a progressive carbon tax. Sustainability, [s. l.], vol. 9, no. 10, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101747.

YANAI, Y.; KAMIJO, Y. Game theory with r. p. 244. Shin-Ogawacho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP: Asakura Publishing Co., Ltd., 2023.

YONGACOGLU, B.; ARSLAN, G.; PAVEL, L.; YÜKSEL, S. Paths to equilibrium in games. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, [s. l.], vol. 37, p. 100870–100894, 2024.